Drawing for LAUREL LINK

USPTO serial 75251053

LAUREL LINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WONG, CONRAD
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAUREL LINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH J SERRITELLA

JOSEPH J SERRITELLA PEPPER HAMILTON & SCHEETZ18TH AND ARCH STS3000 2 LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2799

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036providing information services by telephone in connection with savings accounts, checking accounts, credit cards, loans, and certificates of deposit, and electronic processing of bill payment dataACTIVE—
038telephone communication services, and electronic transmission of data via computer terminalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 1, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 2, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance