Drawing for DATAHIDING

USPTO serial 75251064

DATAHIDING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DATAHIDING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALEXANDER TOGNINO

ALEXANDER TOGNINO IBM CORPN CASTLE DRARMONK, NY 10504UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic apparatus for protection of information signalsACTIVE—
042services for providing security protection to information signalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 20, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 20, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 17, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 19, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 18, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 18, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 29, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance