USPTO serial 75251094
NATURAL WONDERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NATURAL WONDERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL W VAPNEK
Jeffrey L. Snow Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLPOne Lincoln StreetState Street Financial CenterBoston, MA 02111-2950Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | dry mixes to be used as a meat substitute for burgers; dry mixes for chili; dry mixes for falafel; canned and jarred soup; dry mixes for instant soup; dry mixes for ramen noodle soup; dry mixes for instant black beans and refried beans; dry mixes for mashed potatoes and stuffed potatoes; dry mixes for entrees consisting primarily of rice, beans, and lentils; vegetarian soup containing noodles; dry mixes to be used as a meat substitute for sausages; dry mixes for instant hummus; dry mixes for vegetable patties and vegetable burgers; and frozen vegetable patties for burgers | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Dry mixes for tempura; dry mixes for rice, multiple grain, and couscous pilaf; dry mixes for risotto; couscous; basmati rice; arborio rice; jasmine rice; dry mixes for tabouli salad; dry mixes for pasta salad; dry mixes for macaroni and cheese; dry mixes for polenta; and dry mixes for prepared entrees consisting primarily of rice sold with beans and lentils | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 6, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |