Drawing for NATURAL WONDERS

USPTO serial 75251094

NATURAL WONDERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATURAL WONDERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PAUL W VAPNEK

Jeffrey L. Snow Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLPOne Lincoln StreetState Street Financial CenterBoston, MA 02111-2950

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029dry mixes to be used as a meat substitute for burgers; dry mixes for chili; dry mixes for falafel; canned and jarred soup; dry mixes for instant soup; dry mixes for ramen noodle soup; dry mixes for instant black beans and refried beans; dry mixes for mashed potatoes and stuffed potatoes; dry mixes for entrees consisting primarily of rice, beans, and lentils; vegetarian soup containing noodles; dry mixes to be used as a meat substitute for sausages; dry mixes for instant hummus; dry mixes for vegetable patties and vegetable burgers; and frozen vegetable patties for burgersACTIVE—
030Dry mixes for tempura; dry mixes for rice, multiple grain, and couscous pilaf; dry mixes for risotto; couscous; basmati rice; arborio rice; jasmine rice; dry mixes for tabouli salad; dry mixes for pasta salad; dry mixes for macaroni and cheese; dry mixes for polenta; and dry mixes for prepared entrees consisting primarily of rice sold with beans and lentilsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 22, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 28, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 6, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 16, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 5, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 8, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 23, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance