Drawing for ADAPTIVE CONSTANT VOLUME

USPTO serial 75251134

ADAPTIVE CONSTANT VOLUME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALTREE, NICHOLAS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADAPTIVE CONSTANT VOLUME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JASON M HONEYMAN

JASON M HONEYMAN WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic controls for use in the operation of laboratory airflow management systems and sold together as a unit, namely, sensors and monitors, analog and digital controllers, supply and exhaust valves, power supplies and variable speed drivesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 26, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 26, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 14, 1999EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 29, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 29, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 15, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance