USPTO serial 75251234
XE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Warwick CV34 6RG, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANESSA OWEN KRAMER
ANESSA OWEN KRAMER BROOKS & KUSHMAN PC1000 TOWN CTR 22ND FLSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | motor land vehicles, namely, sport utility vehicles, four-wheel drive vehicles, and off-road vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 23, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |