Drawing for THE DUKE ELLINGTON ORCHESTRA

USPTO serial 75251631

THE DUKE ELLINGTON ORCHESTRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE DUKE ELLINGTON ORCHESTRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HELEN D REAVIS

HELEN D REAVIS SCAROLA & REAVIS888 7TH AVE 45TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041entertainment services through the rendition of live musical performancesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 1999CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 17, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 4, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 3, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 1998CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 1, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 5, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance