USPTO serial 75251852
TRIPLEMET 185
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRIPLEMET 185?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S4 7UY, IM
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S4 7UY, IM
SHEFFIELD, SOUTH YORKSHIRE S4 7 UY, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICK J. VICCARO
PATRICK J VICCARO ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INC1000 SIX PPG PLPITTSBURG, PA 15222UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | STEEL AND STEEL ALLOYS IN THE FORM OF SHEETS, BARS, BILLETS AND INGOTS; METAL BARS, RODS AND BILLETS FOR FURTHER MANUFACTURE | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | FORGED VEHICLE AND AERO CAM SHAFTS AND CRANK SHAFTS; SEMI-FINISHED AND FORGED AERO DRIVESHAFTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | SEMI-FINISHED AND FORGED VEHICLE DRIVE SHAFTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Special Melted Products Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Special Melted Products Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by ALLVAC LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named TRIPLEMET 185
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 14, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 22, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |