Drawing for BODYTRONIC

USPTO serial 75251854

BODYTRONIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BODYTRONIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CATHERINE J HOLLAND

CATHERINE J HOLLAND KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009mechanical and electronic equipment, components and modules, and computer programs for the acquisition, measurement, regulation and control of functions in land, water, and air vehicles, namely, remote control power door locking and unlocking units; electronic door lock control units on the inside or outside of door switch panels and door latch electronics; remote control garage door openers and closers; electronic seat control units; climate control units; parking assistance units; rain and fog sensors; automatic headlight controls; navigation and global positioning systems; voice guidance and recognition systems; message display systems; vehicle immobilizer systems; vehicle alarm systems and sensors therefore, namely, tilt sensors, glass breakage sensors, ultrasonic volume detection sensors; vehicle security systems; biometeric vehicle access and driving permission; multiple-link anti-theft systems; sirens; electronic devices for the central control of all electronic components and electronic functions in the vehicles; intelligent fuse boxes; electrical fuses/sophisticated device that combines conventional or electronic fuses, power supply and other electronic functions for the vehicle; electrical power distribution systems; instrument clusters with integrated electronics, indicating systems and displays; electronic junction boxes; in-vehicle networking systems, namely, multiplex-, can-network; modules, namely, domelamp modules; roof electronic modules; dashboard modules; steering column electronics modules and cockpit modules; smart electronic connectors and actuatorsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 25, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance