USPTO serial 75251953
PIXEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PIXEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARRY P MILLER
BARRY P MILLER SHULMAN ROGERS GANDAL PORDY & ECKER PA11921 ROCKVILLE PIKE 3RD FLROCKVILLE, MD 20852-2743UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic publications, namely, magazines in the fields of arts, fashion, and graphic art recorded on magnetic and optical computer discs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 7, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |