USPTO serial 75251964
COLOMBIAN GOLD BREWED WITH ONLY THE FINEST INGREDIENTS FROM THE HARVEST LAND OF COLOMBIA. BEER MADE IN COLOMBIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COLOMBIAN GOLD BREWED WITH ONLY THE FINEST INGREDIENTS FROM THE HARVEST LAND OF COLOMBIA. BEER MADE IN COLOMBIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grosse Pointe Woods, MI
Grosse Pointe Woods, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BILL C PANAGOS
734 RIVARD BLVDGROSSE POINTE, MI 48230UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | beer, ale, porter and preparations for making beer, ale and porter | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Matouk, William M.L.
- Other trademarks owned by Matouk, William M.L.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named COLOMBIAN GOLD BREWED WITH ONLY THE FINEST INGREDIENTS FROM THE HARVEST LAND OF COLOMBIA. BEER MADE IN COLOMBIA
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |