USPTO serial 75251997
TITAN INTERNATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TITAN INTERNATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN J LAURENZO
Daniel A. Rosenberg Davis, Brown, Koehn, Shors & Roberts666 Walnut, Suite 2500Des Moines, IA 50309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | wheels, rims, tires, brakes, and brake actuators for agricultural, construction, military, grounds care, and recreational vehicles | ACTIVE | May 22, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 1, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |