USPTO serial 75252031
FLOURISH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLOURISH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Greenford, Middlesex UB6 ONN, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DICKERSON M DOWNING
DICKERSON M DOWNING MORGAN & FINNEGAN345 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10154UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin care products, namely, facial lotions, facial creams, skin creams, eye creams, body lotions, exfoliating skin gel, sun screens, hand creams, skin lightening creams, sold to physicians, including dermatologists and plastic surgeons and other professionals | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations, namely, medicated skin care preparations, sold to physicians, including dermatologists and plastic surgeons and other professionals licensed to write prescriptions | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 1998 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |