Drawing for INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM

USPTO serial 75252052

INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2290650Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 2, 1999
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony B. Askew

Anthony B. Askew King & Spalding LLP1180 Peachtree StreetAtlanta, GA 30309UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business assistance services, namely, providing businesses with specialty trained and highly skilled workers, employment outplacement services offered in partnership with higher education institutions and business consultation servicesEXPIREDMar 7, 1996
041educational services, namely, offering courses of instruction at the university level in partnership with businessesEXPIREDMar 7, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2010CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 5, 2010CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Oct 30, 20088.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Oct 30, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Sep 24, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2005PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Aug 8, 20058.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Aug 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 20048.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Nov 2, 1999R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Aug 25, 1999CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 2, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance