Drawing for SAFEPATH

USPTO serial 75252186

SAFEPATH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, ELIZABETH WOOD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAFEPATH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HEIDI A SCHILLER

125 SIDNEY STCAMBRIDGE, MA 02139UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009software for use in enhancing storage subsystems for providing automatic error recovery for server-to-storage data path failuresABANDONEDDec 15, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 1998ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 20, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance