USPTO serial 75252449
BPCI A BAKER HUGHES COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WARD, JOYCE A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BPCI A BAKER HUGHES COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN A LITTLEFIELD
STEPHEN A LITTLEFIELD BAKER HUGHES INCP O BOX 4740HOUSTON, TX 77210-4740UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | demulsifiers and corrosion inhibitors for use in industrial processes and oil field and refinery processes, chemicals for use in the petroleum industry, scale inhibitors, hydrogen sulfide scavengers and mercaptan scavengers for use in the petroleum industry, chemical additives for fuel treatment, chemical additives for drilling fluid, oil and gas well service chemicals, crude oil production chemicals, chemical additives for use in natural gas pipelines, oil field water treatment chemicals, chemical additives for use in treatment of finished refinery products, antifoamers, defoamers, chemical additives for improving flotation; chemical additives for the agricultural industry | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |