Drawing for DUPONT ANSWERS

USPTO serial 75252670

DUPONT ANSWERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUPONT ANSWERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FREDERICK F ALEXANDRE

FREDERICK F ALEXANDRE E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND CO1007 MARKET STWILMINGTON, DE 19898UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035retail store services directed to commercial consumers which feature materials and services for the installation of flooring products, namely, carpet, vinyl flooring, hardwood flooring, and flooring underlaymentACTIVE—
036value determination of used carpet for purposes of recyclingACTIVE—
037installation, maintenance, and cleaning of flooring products, namely, carpet, vinyl flooring, and hardwood flooring, and removal of used carpetACTIVE—
039transportation by truck of used carpet for recyclingACTIVE—
040recycling of used carpet into raw materials, namely, automobile parts, carpet fiber, sod reinforcements, wood-like products, sound proofing material, and paddingACTIVE—
042providing quality assurance services in the field of carpeting and flooring; and sorting used carpet for recycling purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 29, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 31, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 2, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 2, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 10, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 2, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 6, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance