Drawing for COMPONENT WAREHOUSE

USPTO serial 75253011

COMPONENT WAREHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPONENT WAREHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew W. Walch

MATTHEW W WALCH LATHAM & WATKINSSEARS TWR STE 5800S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in database access, navigation, implementation, administration, conversion, migration and management; computer software for database query and reporting; computer software for collecting, assembling, formatting, distributing and disseminating information, data and files; computer software for client/server and remote computing applications; computer software for global, local and wide area network access, uploading, downloading, searching and management; computer software containing development tools and utilities; computer software for computer systems management; computer software for backup, restoration and management of computer data and system files; computer software for programming and application development; computer software for global and wide area network access and development tools and utilities; computer software containing graphical user interfaces and toolkits; computer software for computer software development and design; computer software containing program code information for computer usersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2001EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2001EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 1, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2000EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 1, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 21, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 1, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 24, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 28, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 1, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 8, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 7, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 18, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 4, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance