USPTO serial 75253190
VILLAGE BANKING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VILLAGE BANKING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alison Choppelas
ALISON CHOPPELAS OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLYP O BOX 10356PALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | financing services in the nature of providing business loans to impoverished people through the establishment of local self-government banking groups | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 16, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 2, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |