Drawing for MPEG MOVIEMAKER

USPTO serial 75253228

MPEG MOVIEMAKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MPEG MOVIEMAKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS I ROZSA

THOMAS I ROZSA ROZSA & CHEN LLP15910 VENTURA BLVD STE 1601ENCINO, CA 91436-2815UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware and software for MPEG encoding of video and audioACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 8, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 9, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 26, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 14, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 13, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 23, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 28, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance