USPTO serial 75253868
COLORADO PRODUCT CONCEPTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COLORADO PRODUCT CONCEPTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID WOLF
DAVID WOLF WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | plastic bottles and plastic boxes, plastic caps, plastic hooks, plastic dispensers for personal care products, plastic lids | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | aerosol dispensers not for medical use, perfume atomizers and bottles sold empty, plastic containers for household and kitchen use, plastic tissue holders, soap dishes, plastic bathroom cups, plastic bathroom accessories, namely, towel racks and toilet tissue holders, dispensers for liquid soap, holders for soap, and utensils for kitchen use | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | custom manufacturing of chemicals and cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Colorado Product Concepts, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Colorado Product Concepts, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named COLORADO PRODUCT CONCEPTS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 2, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 29, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |