Drawing for SPARKY

USPTO serial 75253886

SPARKY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPARKY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PETER C MICHALOS

PETER C MICHALOS NOTARO & MICHALOSSTE 6902 EMPIRE STATE BLDG350 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10118-6985

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007bending machines for metal, sliding lathes, steel-turning lathes, polishing machines, milling machines, sharpening machines for tools; sanding machines for plastic; hand operated electrical machine tools, namely, drilling machines for wood, planing machines for wood, sawing machines, circular sawing machines, jig saws, routers, impact drills, two speed impact drills, rotary hammers, angle grinders, straight grinders, random orbital sanders; motors and enignes not for land vehicles; mechanical plows, agricultural sprayers, grafting machines, machine driving belts, endless belts for machinery, clutches for machines; cog wheels for machinesACTIVE—
008hand tools, namely, spades, filed hoes, garden hoes, rakes, drill sockets, bits, emery wheels, corundum wheels; hand saws, hacksaw blades; files, planers; hammers, screwdrivers, screw wrenches, adjustable wrenches, pliers, cutting pliers; mason's hammers, trowels for masonsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 2, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 16, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 4, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 25, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 20, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance