USPTO serial 75253887
SHADOW MASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHADOW MASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Liverpool L13 1EH, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANGELO NOTARO
ANGELO NOTARO NOTARO & MICHALOSEMPIRE STATE BLDG350 5TH AVE STE 6902NEW YORK, NY 10118-6985Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer and video game software | ACTIVE | Feb 6, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 16, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |