USPTO serial 75254740
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID H T KANE
DAVID H T KANE KANE DALSIMER SULLIVAN LURUCZ LEVY ET AL711 THIRD AVE 20TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | fruit-based fillings for cakes, pies, breads, muffins, scones, doughnuts, and baked pastries; preparations and ingredients for making cakes, pies, breads, muffins, scones, doughnuts, and baked pastries, namely, edible fats, oils, vegetables, apples, cheese and meat | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | chocolate-based and custard-based fillings for cakes, pies, breads, muffins, scones, doughnuts, and baked pastries; pies, cakes, breads, muffins, scones, doughnuts, and baked pastries; preparations and ingredients for making pies, cakes, breads, muffins, scones, doughnuts, and baked pastries, namely, sugar, salt pepper, and spices | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | retail shops and outlets featuring fast food and baked goods, bakery shops and catering services | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |