USPTO serial 75254765
LUXURY HANDRAILS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 28, 1999
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LUXURY HANDRAILS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Laguna Niguel, CA
Laguna Niguel, CA
Laguna Niguel, CA
Laguna Niguel, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KIT M STETINA
KIT M STETINA STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE, STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | furniture accessories, namely, handrails and assembly brackets sold as a unit | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 15, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HOLLANDER, MARK D.
- Other trademarks owned by HOLLANDER, MARK D.
- Other trademarks owned by MARTIN, RALPH D.
- Other trademarks owned by MARTIN, RALPH D.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named LUXURY HANDRAILS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2006 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 1998 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 1998 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Aug 19, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |