Drawing for SAILINGWEATHER

USPTO serial 75254845

SAILINGWEATHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYS, PAULA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAILINGWEATHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TIMOTHY D PECSENYE

TIMOTHY D PECSENYE BLANK ROME COMISKY & MCCAULEYONE LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042weather information and planning service provided via a global computer network, television, cable, and telephone, offering weather maps, data, information, and graphics focused around the event of sailingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 18, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 30, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 30, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 28, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 8, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 17, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 16, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 26, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance