USPTO serial 75255166
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEBORAH BAILEY-WELLS
DEBORAH BAILEY-WELLS BAKER & MCKENZIE2 EMBARCADERO CTR 24TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3909UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | unexposed cinematographic films | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | systems for creating and integrating audible, visual and tactile sensations in specially-equipped theaters with sound replay systems, comprised principally of projection screens, photographic and cinematographic projectors, tape-recorders and tape players, computerized controllers for integrating the operation of projectors, sound replay equipment, theater lighting and devices for imparting motion to theater seats, and magnetic tapes, magnetic discs, digital discs and recorded conventional and three-dimensional motion picture films and video-tapes containing the coding necessary to enable the controllers to operate and control the sensation-producing devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | advertising slogan and cartoon character licensing of characters related to film, video and TV programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | services for the duplication of films, video-tapes and TV programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | publication of books; production of films, video-tapes and TV programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | development services for others of visual and audio techniques for three-dimensional films or tapes, in the field of cinematography and photography; development services for others for a projection device for theaters with sound replay facilities; development services for others for the visual and audio play-back devices in theaters by using computer controlled projectors, tapes or disc players to show three dimensional long lasting motion picture images as well as managing the sound, lights and the corresponding movement of the theater seats; and book printing services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |