USPTO serial 75255477
EVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RUSSELL B MILLER
RUSSELL B MILLER QUALCOMM INC6455 LUSK BLVDSAN DIEGO, CA 92121-2779UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | wireless communication apparatus, namely, modems, cellular telephones, wireless local loop telephones and personal communication services (PCS) handsets with manuals and accessories therefor sold as a unit, fitted carrying cases, belt clips, battery chargers and batteries and car kits consisting of audio speakers, microphones, and external antenna connectors; computer and personal digital assistant (PDA) device accessories, namely, fax/modem cards and manuals sold together as a unit and interconnect cabling for connection to wireless communication devices and wireline telephone systems; computer software for operating modems, computer software for interfacing with modems, computer programs for wireless local loop telephones, cellular telephones, personal communication services PCS handsets and personal digital assistant PDA devices processors; integrated circuits for spread spectrum modulation and demodulation, error correction encoding and decoding, vocoding and preprogrammed memories containing processor instructions; Radio Frequency (RF) and Intermediate Frequency (IF) transceiver circuit assemblies and analog and digital signal processing circuit assemblies for wireless communication apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 24, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |