USPTO serial 75255488
PACIFIC BELL INSTANT OFFICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUNN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PACIFIC BELL INSTANT OFFICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHETUAN L SHAFFER
CHETUAN L SHAFFER SBC TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES INC175 E HOUSTON ST 12TH FLSAN ANTONIO, TX 78205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, providing customers with a minimum of two telephone lines, telephone service featuring a minimum of two custom calling features, and a calling card | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2001 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | EX5M | SOU EXTENSION 5 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | EX5D | SOU EXTENSION 5 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |