USPTO serial 75256044
RIBBON CONNECTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIBBON CONNECTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TOD L GAMLEN
TOD L GAMLEN BAKER & MCKENZIE660 HANSEN WAYPALO ALTO, CA 94043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | artificial flowers, artificial fruit, artificial garlands, artificial plants, hair bands, barrettes, bobbin lace, hair bows, hair ribbons, bows for gift wrapping, braids, chenille, ornaments for clothing, elastic ribbons, embroidery, silver embroidery for garments, gold embroidery for garments, artificial flower wreaths, hat ornaments not of precious metal, lace trimming, shoe laces, ornamental bows of textile for decoration, ornamental ribbons made of textiles, hair ornaments, shoe ornaments not of precious metal, prize ribbons, ribbons, ribbons for gift wrapping, artificial wreaths, fringes, elastic tape, needlepoint kits consisting of patterns, yarns, needles, and canvas | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 1999 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 14, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |