USPTO serial 75257112
ICECRUSHER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ICECRUSHER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY C HONEYCUTT
GARY C HONEYCUTT TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCP O BOX 655474 MSC 219DALLAS, TX 75265UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | development systems and equipment used to apply in-circuit emulators, namely, computers and computer programs used to implement and make corrections to in-circuit emulator programs and circuits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2000 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 30, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |