USPTO serial 75257553
SMARTSERIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTSERIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURA GENOVESE MILLER
LAURA GENOVESE MILLER WOODCOCK WASHBURN KURTZMACKIEWICZ & NORRIS LLPONE LIBERTY PL 46TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | microprocessor-based communications system, communications management system, and emergency notification system, for use in industrial environments and featuring a control panel; telephone handsets; telephone receivers; telephone interfaces; radio interfaces; supervised input/output devices; software; amplifiers; alarms; microphones; loudspeakers; receivers; strobe lights; and printers | ACTIVE | Jan 13, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 27, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |