USPTO serial 75257676
IMPASSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2736914Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 15, 2003
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IMPASSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, INC.
WILMINGTON, DE
SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, INC.
WILMINGTON, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEITH E. SHARKIN
JAMES A ZELLINGER SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION INC410 SWING RDGREENSBORO, NC 27409UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Insecticides for the protection of wood against termites and other wood-attacking insects, for domestic, commercial and industrial use; termite control system comprised primarily of one or more of the following- insecticides for the protection of wood against termites and other wood-attacking insects, for domestic, commercial and industrial use; insecticides for the protection of wood against termites and other wood-attacking insects, for domestic, commercial and industrial use in the nature of insecticide-treated polymeric sheets, laminates, fabrics and plastic vapor barriers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2002 |
| 017 | Products containing polymers and insecticides for protection of wood against termites and other wood attacking insects, namely, polymer sheets, polymer laminates, polymer-containing fabrics, polymer vapor barriers, polymer wraps for sheathing construction materials, polymer boots and sleeves, for use in connection with pipes and conduits, all containing insecticide; and construction foam materials containing insecticide | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2002 |
| 021 | Insect monitor in the nature of a container into which bait or insecticides can be placed for determining insect infestation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZENECA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ZENECA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named IMPASSE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 4, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 1, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |