Drawing for TELEDISPATCH

USPTO serial 75258808

TELEDISPATCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TELEDISPATCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT W ADAMS

ROBERT W ADAMS NIXON & VANDERHYE PC1100 N GLEBE RD 8TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009integrated vehicle dispatch system comprising computer hardware and software, namely, a unique Graphical User Interface (GUI), Customized Geographical Information System (GIS) mapping comprising various computer hardware and software, Mobile Data Terminals (MDT's), GLobal Positioning System Technology (GPS), Automatic Vehicle Location Technology (AVL), wireless radio frequency or Cellular Digital Packet Data (CDPD), or satellite communication, schedule adherence, traffic light preemption, vehicle "bunching" prevention, passenger transfer connection protection, real time passenger information, open database design, fully integrated with other similar systems, thus substantially improving customer service while reducing costs and being capable of interfacing with a wide range of industry standard systems to provide management solutions for transit and private fleet operationsACTIVE—
035providing automated telephone information featuring schedules and records for transit riders via buses and mass transit vehiclesACTIVE—
039operation of a computerized transportation systemACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 3, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 25, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2000CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 3, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 23, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance