Drawing for DIAMOND JET

USPTO serial 75259551

DIAMOND JET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIAMOND JET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith P. Schoeneberger

KEITH P SCHOENEBERGER ROSS & HARDIES150 N MICHIGAN AVE STE 2500CHICAGO, IL 60601-7567UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016High resolution, specially coated papers for use with ink jet printersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 2, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance