USPTO serial 75260248
DYNAMOTORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DYNAMOTORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hunting Valley, OH
Hunting Valley, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT V VICKERS
ROBERT V VICKERS FAY SHARPE FAGAN MINNICH & MCKEE1100 SUPERIOR AVESEVENTH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | electric motors for machines and electric controls therefor, sold as a unit | ACTIVE | Mar 28, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 3, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |