USPTO serial 75260447
PERLSCRIPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2664699Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 17, 2002
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PERLSCRIPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver British Columbia, CA
VANCOUVER, BC V7Y 1C6, CA
VANCOUVER, BC V7Y 1C6, CA
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK M YANG
ACTIVESTATE SOFTWARE INC.409 GRANVILLE SUITE 1700VANCOUVER B.C., V6C1T2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for developing and maintaining a website on the global computer network; and for managing a computer system, namely computer system memory resources, security and user access | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ACTIVEWARE INTERNET CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by ACTIVESTATE TOOL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ACTIVESTATE TOOL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ACTIVESTATE SOFTWARE INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PERLSCRIPT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 17, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |