Drawing for AMS

USPTO serial 75261792

AMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BILLINGS, JESSIE W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALBERT B KIMBALL JR

ALBERT B KIMBALL JR BRACEWELL AND PATTERSON711 LOUISIANA ST STE 2900HOUSTON, TX 77002-2781UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037installation, maintenance, repair and replacement of air conditioning and heating equipment, plumbing and electrical systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 26, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 26, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 24, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 30, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 25, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 20, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance