USPTO serial 75262177
SUNTREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUNTREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
46766 Herzlia, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY CASTORINA
ANTHONY CASTORINA MARK FRIEDMAN LTD2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY STE 207ARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | chocolate based food beverages; cocoa based food beverages; coffee based food beverages; biscuits; bread; cakes; candy, namely, caramels; chocolate based food beverages with milk; cocoa based food beverages with milk; coffee based food beverages with milk; ice cream; salad dressings; processed cereals, namely, corn flakes, maize flakes and oak flakes; food flavorings, not being essential oils; food flavorings, not being essential oils, for beverages; honey; syrup for use in the preparation of golden syrup; royal jelly for human consumption [not for medical purposes]; ketchup; mayonnaise; meat pies; mustard; noodles; oatmeal; processed oats, namely, crushed oats and husked oats; pasta, passtries; peanut candy; pizzas; potato flour for food; puddings; salad dressings; sauces; spaghetti; sugar; sugar candy; natural sweeteners; tea; tomato sauce; vegetable based coffee substitutes; wheat flour | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |