USPTO serial 75262296
FOA FUTURE OFFENSIVE AIRCRAFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOA FUTURE OFFENSIVE AIRCRAFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Warrington, Cheshire WA2 7AR, GB
Warrington, Cheshire WA2 7AR, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS Q HENRY
THOMAS Q HENRY BANK ONE CTR TWRWOODARD EMHARDT NAUGHTON MORIARTY ET AL111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, computer programmes, computer programs, computer simulations which provide flight training tghrough the use of flight simulators and combat simulators, computer games; simulators; flight simulators, combat and warfare simulators; electrical, electronic and computer apparatus and instruments for use as or with flight simulators, combat and warfare simulators | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | provision of recreation facilities; amusement services; providing access to games and to flight simulators, combat and warfare simulations via international computer networks or other computer on-line facilities; providing access to and leasing access time to computer simulations of flight, combat and warfare for use via international computer networks or other computer on-line facilities; providing information from a computer database on-line and providing facilities for computer simulations of flight, combat and warfare on international computer networks or other computer on-line facilities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Image Design Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Image Design Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named FOA FUTURE OFFENSIVE AIRCRAFT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |