USPTO serial 75262460
FLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-71711 Steinheim/Murr, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul A. Welter
PAUL A WELTER MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric power tools and parts and accessories therefor, namely, angle grinders, straight grinders, grinding pads and disc, cutting stones, rough-edge trimmers, metal shears and metal nibblers, surface sanding machines, polishing machines, and grinding wheels, brushes, belts and pads; core drills and bits and cutters therefor; saber saws, jig saws, band saws and blades therefor; mixers, mixing stations and mixing heads; chasing, cutting and milling machines and cutting discs for floors and walls; core drilling machines, drill stands and core drilling units and drill bits therefor; driver drills and screwdrivers, drilling hammers; gutter support groove cutters, bath tub cutters, and concrete cutters, industrial vacuum cleaners, ruck sack vacuum cleaners and hoses therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 16, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |