Drawing for SUPPLY CHAIN LINK

USPTO serial 75262618

SUPPLY CHAIN LINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERSHKOWITZ, MERYL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPPLY CHAIN LINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KIMBERLY GAMBREL

KIMBERLY GAMBREL KILLWORTH GOTTMAN HAGAN & SCHAEFF1 DAYTON CTR1 S MAIN ST STE 500DAYTON, OH 45402-2023

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer programs for use in automating tool dispensers, monitoring and reporting on transactions conducted at tool dispensers, and for linking individual tool dispensers to internal and external information systemsACTIVEJan 10, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 26, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 29, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 29, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 5, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 27, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 11, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance