USPTO serial 75262836
SPEEDHUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 6, 2002
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SPEEDHUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ROHLOFF GESELLSCHAFT FUR ANTRIEBSTECHNISCHE ENTWICKLUNGEN mbH
D-34125 Kassel, DE
Other trademarks owned by ROHLOFF GESELLSCHAFT FUR ANTRIEBSTECHNISCHE ENTWICKLUNGEN mbH
ROHLOFF GESELLSCHAFT FUR ANTRIEBSTECHNISCHE ENTWICKLUNGEN mbH
D-34125 Kassel, DE
Other trademarks owned by ROHLOFF GESELLSCHAFT FUR ANTRIEBSTECHNISCHE ENTWICKLUNGEN mbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J STRIKER
MICHAEL J STRIKER STRIKER STRIKER & STENBY103 E NECK RDHUNTINGTON, NY 11743UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | bicycle parts, namely, hubs, multiple speed hubs and bottom bracket ball bearings, and replacement parts therefor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROHLOFF GESELLSCHAFT FUR ANTRIEBSTECHNISCHE ENTWICKLUNGEN mbH
- Other trademarks owned by ROHLOFF GESELLSCHAFT FUR ANTRIEBSTECHNISCHE ENTWICKLUNGEN mbH
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named SPEEDHUB
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 13, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 27, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |