USPTO serial 75263490
EVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK I PEROFF
Mark I. Peroff Hiscock & Barclay, LLPSeven Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | hair ornaments, namely, hair pieces, barrettes, kamoji (Japanese false hair), kanzashi (Japanese ornamental hairpins), kogai (Japanese ornamental hairpins), tabodome (back hair pins), tabomino (specially shaped hair pieces used in Japanese style coiffuring), toupees/false hair, tegara (Japanese hair tassel bands), negake (Japanese hair ribbons), hair nets, hair bands, hair pins, chignons, decorative round combs, hair ribbons, motoyui (paper cords for tying hair); false beards, false mustaches; non-electric hair curlers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | beauty salons and hair styling services, hair replacement services; hair implanting services not for medical purposes; hair increasing services, namely, increasing the volume of the customer's hair imperceptibly by affixing or mixing hair (including artificial hair) with the customer's own natural hair or false hair | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |