Drawing for BERGER

USPTO serial 75263635

BERGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BERGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STACY L. TAYLOR

STACY L TAYLOR FISH & RICHARDSON PCSTE 1400 HILL RD STE 1004225 EXECUTIVE SQLA JOLLA, CA 92037

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely, boots, caps, jackets, pants, T-shirts, shirts and glovesACTIVEJan 4, 1997
028sporting equipment, namely, snowboardsACTIVEJan 4, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 1999ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 15, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 15, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 6, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 25, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 25, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 7, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 15, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance