USPTO serial 75264076
PAWS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PAWS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WHITNEY THIER
WHITNEY THIER QUIRK & TRATOS3773 HOWARD HUGHES PKWY STE 500 NLAS VEGAS, NV 89109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | magazines, stationery, and other printed matter, namely, catalogs featuring clothing, leather goods, travel bags, games and toys, prerecorded videotapes, audio tapes and compact discs; children books, photograph albums, scrapbook albums, post cards, calendars, greeting cards, address books, note pads, notebooks, writing tablets, stationery, stickers, gift wrapping paper, merchandise bags, place mats of paper and plastic, and playing cards; pens, pencils, erasers, crayons and bookmarks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 22, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |