Drawing for ENCOURAGEMENT MONTHLY

USPTO serial 75264808

ENCOURAGEMENT MONTHLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENCOURAGEMENT MONTHLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANIEL M CISLO

DANIEL M CISLO CISLO & THOMAS233 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 900SANTA MONICA, CA 90401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Distribution of religious material in connection with conducting and organizing religious meetingsACTIVEAug 1, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2001ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Mar 7, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 31, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2000ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Jul 26, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 1998SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 5, 1998IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 7, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 13, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 13, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance