Drawing for DIGITAL GRAFFITI

USPTO serial 75265059

DIGITAL GRAFFITI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2352982Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 30, 2000
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITAL GRAFFITI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MIDGE M HYMAN

MIDGE M HYMAN COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR GRAPHIC ART DESIGN AND MULTIMEDIA DATABASE MANAGEMENTSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—
042COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF GRAPHIC ART DESIGN AND MULTIMEDIA DATABASE MANAGEMENTSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2005C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Oct 4, 2005CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 23, 2005CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jun 3, 2005PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 30, 2000R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 30, 20001.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Mar 30, 2000IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Feb 15, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 23, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 22, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 12, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 28, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 4, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 1, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 31, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 12, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance