USPTO serial 75265069
TECH TOWEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TECH TOWEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRANK G MORKUNAS
7750 DAGGET ST STE 203ASAN DIEGO, CA 92111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | cleaning cloths, cleaning mits, and cleaning pads | ABANDONED | Mar 27, 1997 |
| 024 | napkins for removing makeup, towels, kitchen towels, wash cloths, table cloths, and dish cloths | ABANDONED | Mar 27, 1997 |
| 025 | clothing, namely, head bands, pants and slacks, shirts and blouses, and hats and caps, and dresses and skirts | ABANDONED | Mar 27, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |