USPTO serial 75265268
RUB-THANE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RUB-THANE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Centre Vermont, LU
Centre Vermont, LU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H WARREN BURNAM JR
H WARREN BURNAM JR NIXON & VANDERHYE PC1100 N GLEBE RD 8TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals, unprocessed acrylic resins and unprocessed artificial resins, all for use in the manufacture of inner shoe soles, footwear, boots, overshoes; plastic molding compounds for use in plastic extrusion operations; plastic molding compounds for use in the manufacture of molded plastic articles; plastic molding compounds for use in the manufacture of plastic sheets and films; synthetic resins for use in the manufacture of plastic molding compounds | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | plastics in extruded form for use in the manufacture of inner shoe soles; footwear, boots, overshoes | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | inner shoe soles; footwear, boots; overshoes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JEIGI HOLDING S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by JEIGI HOLDING S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named RUB-THANE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 5, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |