Drawing for CREMONA

USPTO serial 75265320

CREMONA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CREMONA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KENNETH M GARRETT

KENNETH M GARRETT RIDOUT & MAYBEE1 QUEEN ST E STE 2400TORONTO, ON M5C 3B1CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030acidophilous milk; processed anchovies; anchovy paste; artichoke paste; tinned artichokes; soy based milk substitutes; whey based beverages; dairy based beverages; bouillon; butter; butter substitutes; fondue cheese; cheese substitutes; chocolate food beverages; chocolate milk; coconut; cottage cheese; marscapone cheese, cream; cream cheese; non-dairy creamer; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; dairy based dips; dairy based food beverages; dairy based dips; edible fats; edible oil; egg nog; egg nog mixes; entrees, consisting primarily of meat, fish or poultry, meat extracts, fish fillets, fruit paste; fruit peels; fruit preserves; fruit pulps; fruit topping; fruit based filling for cakes and pies; fruit based snack food; fruit based spreads; canned and bottled fruits; dried fruits; frozen fruits; fruits preserved in alcohol; jams; jellies; lentils; luncheon meats; bacon, cured bacon, ham; cured ham, margarine substitues; marmalade, meat; meat paste; meat based spreads, milk; nuts, processed olives, pate; pickled vegetables, pickles, pimientos, tomato puree, fruit salads, vegetable salads; salami; sardines, sausages, shortening, snails, soup mixes, soups, sour cream, sour cream substitutes, soybeans, cheese spreads, tahini, tofu dips, flavoured tofu, tofu spreads, flavoured cheese based spreads, tomato paste, processed tomatoes, dairy topping, non-dairy based toping, tuna fish, salmon, vegetable oils for cooking, vegetable paste, whipping cream, yogurtACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 26, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 10, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 1999CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 17, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance